HI,欢迎来到学术之家,发表咨询:400-888-7501  订阅咨询:400-888-7502  股权代码  102064
0

关于可仲裁性(三)

作者:杨良宜国际仲裁仲裁裁决书争议事项仲裁员英国法纽约公约法院特别规定欺诈

摘要:七、英国英国是伦敦仲裁在国际上大受欢迎的形势下最主要的受惠国。可推想到,英国不会有太多的“不可仲裁”(non-arbitrable)争议事项,特别是在国际仲裁上。 (一)欺诈以往的1950年《仲裁法》,Section 24(2)针对“欺诈”(fraud)曾有特别规定如下: "Where anagreement between any parties provides that disputes which may arise in the future between them shall be referred to arbitration, and a dispute which so arises involves the question whether any such party has been guilty of fraud, the High Court shall, so far as may be necessary to enable that question to be determined by the High Court, have power to order that the agreement shall cease to have effect and power to give leave to revoke the authority of any arbitrator or umpire

注:因版权方要求,不能公开全文,如需全文,请咨询杂志社

北京仲裁

《北京仲裁》是一本有较高学术价值的大型季刊,自创刊以来,交流科技成果,促进学院教学、科研工作的发展,选题新奇而不失报道广度,服务大众而不失理论高度,颇受业界和广大读者的关注和好评。

杂志详情